Mind and Matter

Science tells us that everything in the universe is made of particles, waves, and so on. But what about minds and meaning? Could thoughts and feelings be made up of chemicals and electricity, or are they some other kind of thing? Does a scientific view of the world allow for the existence of free will? Of rationality? Of meaningful thoughts at all? In this colloquium we will examine these questions by thinking about recent work in philosophy and science.

 
 

Course materials:

Introductory stuff for the first weeks:

Course texts:

Readings will be available on TCU Online for free.

Philosophy/psychology/cognitive science in the news

Other content relevant to class

What is it like to be a bat?

Mind and language

Mechanisms and moral responsibility

Artificial intelligence

Fully automated luxury communism

  • Geoffrey Hinton, one of the researchers most responsible for the development of “deep learning” networks, has some interesting thoughts on the future.

  • If you’re interested what the future might look like when automation can do anything, this video from the YouTube channel Economics Explained goes through some of the economic theory behind universal basic income (and less optimistic predictions) about the future under our new machine overlords.

Plant intelligence

  • You might augment your reading of Chamovitz by checking out the Nature documentary “What Plants Talk about” (sometimes on Netflix; currently on YouTube). It covers a lot of similar ground, including factors in dodder predation and some chemical signaling strategies that Chamovitz doesn’t describe in his chapter.

Robotics

 

Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement (modified)
objection to the main point: identifies a critical flaw in the argument.
objection: identifies a flaw in the argument.
mere counterargument: argues against conclusion but does not address reasons.
contradiction: contradicts the conclusion but does not provide an argument.
responding to tone: criticizes the way the author expresses herself but not her reasoning.
ad hominem: criticizes the author without addressing her conclusion or her argument.
name-calling: sounds something like “Socrates is a jerk and nobody likes his face.”

Based on this image, which is based on this article.