Philosophy and Science of Social Justice

Discussions of justice in the 21st century focus increasingly on issues like sexism, racism, transphobia, and ableism. But what are things like race, gender, and disability? Are they biological differences, or are they socially-constructed? Is there such a thing as “implicit” prejudice? Can “equal treatment” sometimes be unjust? In this course we will examine discussions from the humanities and the sciences on topics such as structural and psychological oppression, microaggressions, implicit bias, and other topics. We will also examine how these theoretical perspectives can be informed by scientific methods, as well as how theories of social justice can be used to criticize and inform our scientific practices.

 
 

Course materials

Introductory stuff for the first weeks:

Links

Liberalism

Authenticity

The racial contract

Structural oppression

Feminism

Social construction of gender

Social construction of race

Disability

Implicit bias

Microaggressions

Scientific racism and ethics

Understanding science

Epistemic injustice

Language and prestige

 

Graham’s Hierarchy of Disagreement (modified)
objection to the main point: identifies a critical flaw in the argument.
objection: identifies a flaw in the argument.
mere counterargument: argues against conclusion but does not address reasons.
contradiction: contradicts the conclusion but does not provide an argument.
responding to tone: criticizes the way the author expresses herself but not her reasoning.
ad hominem: criticizes the author without addressing her conclusion or her argument.
name-calling: sounds something like “Socrates is a jerk and nobody likes his face.”

Based on this image, which is based on this article.